Opinion" is a pithy, heavily spiced editorial that can be delivered to
your in-box once a week. If you like what you read then feel free to forward it
to everyone you've ever met, and to subscribe at www.libz.org
11 April, 2002
Killing the Beachfront Barbie
By Peter Cresswell
As part of a nationwide project for the Discovery Channel, Helen Clark is travelling the country with the Channel's cameramen to "show 120 million viewers what this country has to offer." This week, the Hauraki Herald boasted a front-page photograph of Helen Clark at
Why, I wondered, did Ms Clark not adopt the
'Baywatch' policy when filming in such obviously arctic circumstances - bravely
donning her swimming cossie, gritting her teeth, and
showing a brave face to the international audience? Or did the Discovery
Channel's director perhaps fear for the adverse effect of a cossie-clad
In any case, viewers curious about "what this country has to offer" should certainly be made aware that enjoyment of such beachfront property is now increasingly difficult under the loathsome Resource Management Act (RMA), an act that the Labour Party wrote, and that all parliamentary parties support - and one that Jeanette Fitzsimons' Environment Committee promises to make even more onerous, should she be returned after the election!
Under the RMA, beachfront property owners
Owners of beachfront property at
The argument goes that the "intrinsic value" of the environment is what the RMA is supposed to protect, and therefore planners are simply protecting the 'intrinsic value' of such coastal environmental processes as erosion, "dune accretion," and "flooding during a storm." Property owners seeking to avoid, remedy or mitigate the effects of these so-called 'intrinsic values' on their properties are, as you would expect, stopped from doing so by the planners' rules. Building a new beachfront home under these rules is increasingly difficult, and if flooding or erosion threatens existing homes then owners are prohibited from doing anything to stop this natural process; instead, as happened in Gisborne some years ago, they are expected to watch their homes fall into the sea - only to then be prosecuted for despoiling the seashore!
The planners' rules make it enormously difficult, and enormously expensive, to build anything humanly desirable on a beachfront section. For example, property owners may only propose building on their section as far back from the sea as their site will allow. Before being granted consent to build, they must demonstrate to the planners how they will relocate their new house to a new site if a sand dune comes within 8m - including showing planners that they possess another (empty) site to which they can relocate their (now used) house! If they seek to protect themselves from any threatening dune movement, they will of course find that there are rules preventing them from stopping the 'intrinsic value' of such movement. Further, in some areas they are required by law to monitor "the toe of the foredune"; the Western Bay of Plenty District Plan, for example, requires that this toe "be accurately measured every two years by the landowner or their agent with the results reported to Council."
Other rules prevent them doing very much to existing houses. Excavation is 'limited' in these 'Coastal Protection Areas' to 'minor activities' - often interpreted by planners to prohibit any excavation for any new building at all, and usually interpreted to prohibit anybody building seaward-facing decks, such as the one Ms Clark and her family were filmed enjoying for the Discovery Channel!
It seems that if politicians and planners have their way, the days of enjoying a beachfront barbie on a beachfront deck may soon be over.
Unless, perhaps, you are a family friend of the Prime Minister.
© Libz.org 2001
This column may be reproduced anywhere, anytime, by anyone as long as it is reproduced in full, with attribution to libz.org, and that you let Peter know at firstname.lastname@example.org.